The accusation of plagiarism from the Clinton camp didn't hold much water, considering that Deval Patrick gave Obama permission to use his lines.
It brings up the larger point, though, of the authorship of political speech in the first place.
It was telling that Clinton's spokesperson Howard Wolfson in a conference call with reporters refused to guarantee that Clinton had never borrowed from anyone's speeches, or anyone else's words. That's because political speeches and political writing generally is always of dubious authorship. George Bush hasn't written his own speech once in his life. Is that plagiarism?
When a Bush administration official pens an op-ed for the New York Times or the Washington Post, does the Times or the Post verify authorship? Do they confirm that the official, and not a staff member, wrote the piece in its entirety?
Would Paul Krugman be allowed to subcontract his columns? Have a junior staff member write it? Of course not. But the privelege of attaching one's name to work written by others is granted to administration officials all the time. Did George W. Bush actually write the piece that appeared in the Wall Street Journal under his name pledging bipartisanship with the new Democratic-led 110th Congress? What do you think? It's laughable to think Bush wrote any essay on his own, let alone something polished and sophisticated as one of the speeches he can't ever read aloud properly, let alone write.
The point is that leeway is often given to politicians when it comes to authorship, leeway that would not be granted to journalists or academicians. I'm not saying that's a good thing--I think leading papers shouldn't allow staff work to appear under their bosses' names--but it's a reality and it happens all the time. The degree may be different in Obama's case, but borrowing lines from a friend who suggested he do so hardly constitutes a scandal.
That the Clinton camp is trying to make it so shows how desperate they truly are.
UPDATE: David Frum, of all people, on Larry King just now, insisting that the question about Obama was what has he done, not what does he say. Ron Reagan took the words right out of my mouth--what about your guy?
Monday, February 18, 2008
Obama, Plagiarism, and Political Authorship
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




9 comments:
My impression was also that it smacks of desperation.
On an unrelated note, Pho has a post about a blog aggregator dedicated to education news. You probably saw it but I'll pass it along just in case.
Dave,
There is so little originality in political rhetoric -- but given your background in school administration, I wanted to ask you:
If a student gave a speech like Obama's, and used those same lines without attribution, what would be the punishment at your school? (That's not rhetorical either...I really do want to know...)
This made me think about all those academic integrity policies in schools and universities...
Wow - Michele - I don't think we know one another but I wanted to leave almost the exact same question for Dave.
Dave, you know how much I respect you, especially around education. But I had the exact same thought as Michele: we teach our kids that they must not, shall not, cannot plagiarize - take from others without attribution. There's no wiggle room for them just because they got it from their best friend or mother or whomever and that person said yeah, sure - use my words as your own. We teach our kids to do their own work or attribute to whomever did do the work.
Please - think about this.
Obama has the attention of so many people - young people - college students.
Don't you think there's a better message he could be sending than, Deval is my friend and said I could, so it's okay?
Jill,
I so agree. How hard would it have been for Obama to say: "My good friend Deval Patrick says...." ... "and I couldn't have said it better." In fact, I sorta made that case in an entry on
my blog at Education Week (a Dave-inspired entry).
I guess I want to say that this is some of my fear around people who get called a rising star - it becomes so impossible for them to make mistakes and then to say, I made a mistake.
Why? Because everyone expects so much of them, including figuring out how to minimize something that really might be an error, and then that trivializing of something that really shouldn't be trivialized just gets accepted when it would be much bigger of the "rising star" to just say, it was wrong, it shouldn't be done - no matter what the "industry" standard is.
I feel that people are losing objectivity as they dig in more for one candidate or another - probably another reason why I will remain undecided. lol
You guys raise a good point... the answer is yes.
Students doing what Obama did would be disciplined for plagiarism. In fact, if Duval knowingly gave his work to be used by someone else for a grade, at our school, he would be disciplined also.
But then again, to get back to the point in my post, George W. Bush would be disciplined for his essay in the Wall Street Journal. Which I'm sure he didn't write, even though it had his name on it, but someone like David Frum (he was gone by then, but someone like him) probably did. The rules in academia are that you write it, and no one else, or your name doesn't go on it.
In fact, the Wall Street Journal would not publish anything that wasn't actually written by the person whose name was on the byline. People get fired for that. Because the rules in journalism are similar to the rules in academia.
But the rules in politics aren't the same, and politicians get away with ghost written material all the time, both in speeches and in writing. And when Duval Patrick gives permission for Obama to use his words, he essentially becomes a ghost writer along the same lines as Peggy Noonan or David Frum. Why don't we say that Reagan and Bush "stole" material from them? Because they were paid for it? Is that the difference?
I just don't think that what we have here is a case of plagiarism like we deal with in the academic world. If so, then every politician since Nixon is guilty. To quote one of Obama's other unfortunate phrases, "no one's hands are clean."
BTW, Jill, you should know Michele: She writes a fantastic blog that you would appreciate for Edweek, and it's in my sidebar. Campaign k-12. Go check it out.
And Michele, fyi, Jill is Ohio's top blogger. You'd like her work, too.
runescape money runescape gold as runescape money buy runescape money runescape gold runescape gold runescape money buy runescape money runescape money runescape gold wow power leveling wow powerleveling Warcraft Power Leveling Warcraft PowerLeveling buy runescape gold buy runescape money runescape itemsrunescape accounts runescape gp dofus kamas buy dofus kamas Guild Wars Gold buy Guild Wars Gold
圣诞树 小本创业
小投资
条码打印机 证卡打印机
证卡打印机 证卡机
标签打印机 吊牌打印机
探究实验室 小学科学探究实验室
探究实验 数字探究实验室
数字化实验室 投影仪
投影机 北京搬家
北京搬家公司 搬家
搬家公司 北京搬家
北京搬家公司 月嫂
育儿嫂 月嫂
育婴师 育儿嫂
婚纱 礼服
婚纱摄影 儿童摄影
圣诞树 胶带
牛皮纸胶带 封箱胶带
高温胶带 铝箔胶带
泡棉胶带 警示胶带
耐高温胶带 特价机票查询
机票 订机票
国内机票 国际机票
电子机票 折扣机票
打折机票 电子机票
特价机票 特价国际机票
留学生机票 机票预订
机票预定 国际机票预订
国际机票预定 国内机票预定
国内机票预订 北京特价机票
北京机票 机票查询
北京打折机票 国际机票查询
机票价格查询 国内机票查询
留学生机票查询 国际机票查询
Post a Comment